[T]he trial court’s finding that the initial traffic stop was supported by reasonable suspicion is supported by competent, credible evidence.


State v. Bartholomew

2020 – Ohio – 4611

Fourth District Appellate Court

Pickaway, County Ohio

September 25, 2020

On Friday January 18, 2019 the principal of the Circleville Middle School received information that one his thirteen-year-old female students was going to be picked up at the end of the school day by a twenty-six-year-old male to engage in sex.  This felony was going to be surreptitiously done without the girl’s parents’ consent.

Officer David McIntyre was the school resource officer and was made aware of this information and stood watch of the parking lot as during pick up.  While the children were being picked-up he observed a black SUV leaving the school parking lot.  The driver was traveling at a high rate of speed, passing other cars and squealing his tires.  Officer McIntyre was in a cruiser and based on this reckless driving, conducted a traffic stop.  He identified the driver as Mr. Christopher Bartholomew.  Mr. Bartholomew immediately lied and said he was there to pick up his buddy’s child.  Officer McIntyre did not believe Mr. Bartholomew as he matched the description of the predator as described by the principal.  Officer Kory Yoder arrived to back up Officer McIntyre and detained Mr. Bartholomew while Officer McIntyre went back inside the school.

Circleville Middle School, 360 Clark Drive, Circleville, Ohio.

Officer McIntyre spoke with the principal, the student and her parents.  He was given consent to look at the student’s phone which contained Snapchat messages between the student and Mr. Bartholomew.  At this time the student admitted that Mr. Bartholomew was there to pick her up so they could go have sex.  She explained that they had met on the Internet Application ‘Whisper’.  Based on this additional information Officer McIntyre arrested Mr. Bartholomew for Criminal Child Enticement.  During the search incident to arrest two phones were confiscated and placed in Airplane mode to secure the data while a search warrant could be obtained.

Two search warrants were obtained for the phones and child pornography was discovered.  Mr. Bartholomew was charged on a twenty-six-count felony indictment on the following:

Pandering Obscenity Involving a Minor, 2907.321 – eleven counts F4

Illegal Use of Minor in Nudity – Oriented material, 2907.323 (A)(3) – eleven counts F5

Importuning 2907.07 (D)(1) – one count F5

The original Criminal Child Enticement was dismissed in favor of pursuing the felony charges.

Mr. Bartholomew plead not guilty and filed a Motion to Suppress.  The motion was denied, and he plead guilty to six counts of pandering obscenity involving a minor and one count of importuning, in exchange for dismissal of the remaining counts of the indictment.  He was sentenced to an aggregate of six years in prison and appealed the denial of the Motion to Suppress.  The appeal focused on two issues; one was on the Criminal Child Enticement statute had previously been ruled unconstitutional.  Ultimately the court did not agree with Mr. Bartholomew and I will not analyze the constitutionality of the statute.  The second issue focused on the detainment of Mr. Bartholomew at the time of the stop, which will be analyzed.

The court reviewed Officer McIntyre’s reasonable suspicion to detain and subsequent probable cause to arrest  “[T]he trial court found that the initial stop was justified based upon testimony during the suppression hearing that Officer McIntyre observed Bartholomew speeding and passing other vehicles in the school parking lot, which the officer described as erratic driving that included the squealing of tires. Based upon this testimony, we cannot conclude the trial court erred in determining the initial stop was justified as even a de minimis traffic violation provides the required reasonable suspicion to initiate a stop. Additionally, taking into consideration the information that the officer had received from the school principal, the record before us indicates he had reasonable, articulable suspicion that Bartholomew had already or was about to commit a crime. Thus, the trial court’s finding that the initial traffic stop was supported by reasonable suspicion is supported by competent, credible evidence. Once Bartholomew was stopped and it was determined he matched the description of the male that was supposed to be picking up the minor from school, Officer McIntyre detained him while he conducted further investigations, which involved speaking to the minor and her parents, as well as examining messages between the minor and Bartholomew on the minor’s cell phone. It was this portion of the investigation that led to Bartholomew’s arrest, the seizure of his cell phones, and the subsequent search of the contents of his phones pursuant to a warrant.”.

The court held “[W]e conclude there was probable cause for Bartholomew’s arrest and the seizure of his cell phones incident to his arrest, and we further conclude that the subsequent search thereof pursuant to the issuance of a warrant was valid.”.  Mr. Bartholomew was sentenced to six years in prison. At sentencing he said that his conviction “Was the best thing that ever happened to me.”.  Despite of this “best thing” he appealed his conviction to the Fourth District Appellate Court.

Information for this article was obtained from State v. Bartholomew, 2020 – Ohio – 4611 and news articles. In the below link you can hear Mr. Bartholomew say that being arrested was the “[B]est thing that ever happened to me.”.


This case is binding in the Fourth District Appellate Court in the following counties: Adams, Athens, Gallia, Highland, Hocking, Jackson, Lawrence, Meigs, Pickaway, Pike, Ross, Scioto, Vinton and Washington.

Lessons Learned:

  1. When Officer McIntyre learned that a predator was going to pick up a thirteen-year-old child at HIS school he immediately went into Sheepdog mode. No predator was going to prey on his students; NOT ON THIS DAY!  He stood watch over the parking lot and in very typical criminal fashion, a felon-to-be could not help himself by essentially saying LOOK AT ME when he committed traffic violations in the parking lot.  After making the traffic stop and obtaining back up, Officer McIntyre reasonably detained Mr. Bartholomew to obtain Reasonable Suspicion for the detention of Mr. Bartholomew.  Officer McIntyre should be commended for pursuing this criminal charge in the moment.  Time was of the essence because a detention can become unreasonable if law enforcement does not actively pursue more information or evidence.  On this day, Officer McIntyre diligently pursued information and evidence and once obtained from the victim the reasonable suspicion grew into probable cause to arrest predator Bartholomew.
  1. The Fourth Amendment has no time clock. However, time is not unlimited.  A prime takeaway is that if law enforcement has a person detained without probable cause, the time of reasonable suspicion is ticking.  Law enforcement must actively pursue information or evidence to establish probable cause or alternatively release the detained person because no more information or evidence is obtained.  Law enforcement should release detainees when not enough information or evidence is established, as often is the case there will be another opportunity in the future.
  1. Learn more about Reasonable Suspicion in the following articles:

Was Sixty Seconds Enough Time to Establish Reasonable Suspicion?

Gary Played Reasonable Suspicion TAG and Lost

The Air Fresheners were So “Overwhelming” It Actually had the Scent of Reasonable Suspicion

Officer Williams’ Gut Feeling was Scientifically Accurate But Was It Legally Justified?

Does your agency train on Reasonable Suspicion?

Don’t fail your training.

Don’t let your training fail you!

Be safe, smart and Objectively Reasonable!

Robert H. Meader Esq.